Insufficient number of trials for the search space available for development
Insufficient number of trials for the search space available for development
shogochiai As an observation balloon, I think "Solidity development cost", "developer training cost", and "gas cost" should all be approximated to zero. I think "Solidity development cost", "developer training cost" and "gas cost" should all be approximated to zero. To that end, I'd welcome a wave of modularity and a flexing of the tangible. Because, to put it shortly, knowing that I am short of words, "the number of trials is clearly insufficient for the search space available for development". I won't explain the detailed intent here, but I see the quantitative relationship of "money raising > ideas > implementation skills" as still the same. On the other hand, I don't think there is a better place than Eth L1 as "an environment to assemble assets around any value medium other than cash and to and from the real world without institutional hardship and security concerns", and "a way to give Next Billion exposure to crypto assets" is a good example of a scaled I think there are many cases where TradFi can build ETFs based on conventional web infrastructure without using L2.
The point is simply that I think diversity is good, and I find each tug of war interesting. Excuse my rambling.
shogochiai I wrote this to visualize the poles of the tug of war and to improve coordination ---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/開発可能な探索空間に対して試行回数が足りていない using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.